Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 02:27

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Food and fitness make or break success on weight loss meds, report finds - ABC News
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
The Full ‘Squid Game’ Season 3 Trailer Teases a Wild and Violent End - Gizmodo
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Dakota Johnson Uses Tissue to Cover Cleavage Amid Wardrobe Malfunction - Yahoo
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Have you ever accidentally found out that you were about to be fired?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Inflation report suggests damage from Trump's tariffs isn't guaranteed - Axios
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Astronomers discover the largest 'ultramassive' black hole ever seen - Earth.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.